I think he clearly had the capability to set #1 times without these small-time cheats, but for some reason was compelled to use them years ago. At times, purposefully cheating to take back a #1 spot from a more blatant cheater.
What I'd be more concerned about is deceptive and obfuscated cheating. Upmove is sort of deceptive, but I'm talking about fully-automated human-like botting, where it's not immediately evident after the first few demo views. (I highly suspect Camping_Gaz had/has the ability and knowledge to pull this off.) *tinfoil hat*
On another note, I've noticed that in my experience, some apparently legit demos periodically look like they've been recorded in timescale 1.3; often giving a "too fast" effect when viewing in timescale 1. (I won't mention names.) This could be due to mouse and accel settings, background programs, hardware, etc. Imo, it's tough to tell with the naked eye and requires a demo dump like q3a did. Online demos can occasionally provide odd anomalies and missing frames though.
That being said... Upmove, yaw, -128, multiple actions on a key/macros, 0ups scripts, mousewheeling, wallbugging, etc. (While viewed as insignificant by others) is still cheating and damaging to a reputation.
Keep posting more analysis please.