Board index DeFRaG Competitions DFWC 2012

General discussion

Re: General discussion

Postby >luci< » Jan 27th, '11, 4:37 pm

$$-albion wrote:Millionaires? Pffffff, try trillionaires or should I say... trollionaires? *insert coolface* :D deal with it 8-)


loool thats a wining name, of course you can say it! millionary ppl(people) never fail, if so, you can buy it bic! :D
>luci<
 
Posts: 86
Joined: May 2nd, '09, 10:01 pm

Re: General discussion

Postby <)Ghost(> » Feb 8th, '11, 10:38 pm

phase 1: elimination
phase 2: evaluation
phase 3: ???
phase 4: profit!
<)Ghost(>
 
Posts: 347
Joined: May 2nd, '09, 3:19 pm

Re: General discussion

Postby 1000archangels » Aug 3rd, '11, 11:35 am

imo, dfc10-0 was a good idea.
first of all, you can roughly estimate, how many players would play.
in addition, you add the pre-verification as for valid settings.
Of course, with a validation mechanism implemented in an other way 0-stage wouldnt make sense, but as far as i know they didnt have any mechanisms doing that in place.
either that or this simple online script, and that would also work in players' favour - they would know straight away, wether the demo is good or nah.

maybe finally will manage to get myself going, and build a nice strafe only map *khem khem*.

edit:#
lol classic, went through the first page and forgot there are some more left, disregard this post pl0x as everything was already mentioned.. or just treat it as a +1 ;)
1000archangels
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Jun 11th, '10, 5:31 pm

Previous

cron